YPPedia:Recently created admins
See also: YPPedia:Unsuccessful adminship candidacies
To update this page, purge it.
Contents
- 1 Most recent successful nominations
- 1.1 Therobotdude
- 1.2 Addyrielle
- 1.3 Alfwyn
- 1.4 Belthazar451
- 1.5 Kgarrett1969
- 1.6 Muffynz
- 1.7 Amoyer
- 1.8 Faulkston
- 1.9 Lizzie
- 1.10 Piplicus
- 1.11 atteSmythe
- 1.12 Zava
- 1.13 Featherfin
- 1.14 Ponytailguy
- 1.15 Fannon
- 1.16 Nicksterv
- 1.17 Zyborg22
- 1.18 Callistan
- 1.19 Thunderbird
- 1.20 Fiddler
- 1.21 Guppymomma
- 1.22 Yaten
- 1.23 Barrister
Most recent successful nominations
Promoted (4/0/0) July 23, 2014 --Faulkston
Therobotdude
Vote here (4/0/0) ending 03:55 20/7/2014 (UTC)
Therobotdude (talk • contribs) – Therobotdude has over 2000 edits and has shown dedication to the wiki. He has done a great job in cleaning the gunk of the wiki, but I believe he could do even more if he had administrative powers. Guipsp 16:11, 12 July 2014 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept.
Support
- I wholeheartedly support this nomination. Therobotdude has been tireless, friendly, and efficient since he began editing here. He has a good temperament with the ability to maintain a cool head in disputes. He has extensive knowledge about what this wiki needs and how to provide it. And he is a very active user. He is the ideal choice for the job, so there is no question he should get it. Chupchup 16:27, 13 July 2014 (PDT)
- Of course, as the nominator, I support. Guipsp 03:19, 14 July 2014 (PDT)
- I support this nomination as well. Therobotdude has put a lot of effort into the wiki, and has exemplified the ideal of 'See a problem? Fix it!'. He is also very willing to discuss matters when an edit is called into question, and I agree with Chupchup that he keeps a cool head, even when it's his edits called into question. Additionally, I think he's far and away the best active editor of YPPedia that isn't already an admin. I see no reason why he shouldn't be made one. Jlh0605 10:45, 15 July 2014 (PDT)
- Support. I agree with the reasons enumerated above. (And I'll find it amusing for him to become an Admin in time for his one-year anniversary of his YPPedia activity.) -- Franklincain (t/c) 14:09, 15 July 2014 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I would make minor fixes to protected pages (typos, grammar, links, etc) as I've already done across numerous Gameplay/Terminology articles. Additionally, I am interested in organising a new series of featured articles to feed the main page, and admin rights would speed up the process of getting an article up there once the article's been peer-reviewed. As an active user, it'd also be useful to have me around in admin form to address cases of severe disruption/vandalism, weird deletion/undeletion requests and so forth (and I'd finally be able to clean up the small mountain of speedily-delete tagged pages I've left behind!).
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. The swordfighting drop pattern article was one of the first I worked on, in response to players who just wanted to know how a drop pattern worked. I also enjoyed working on spades and hearts, making their layouts consistent with that of the poker article; again, I have known people who would not play the puzzles (particularly spades) because no clear breakdown of scoring was available. Finally, I make edits all over the place in response to ongoing greeter chat questions, since it's important that the wiki continues to provide useful information that players want to know.
Promoted (9/0/0) December 13, 2009 --Cedarwings
Addyrielle
Vote here (9/0/0) ending 23:34 December 13th, 2009 (UTC)
Addyrielle (talk • contribs) – Addyrielle is a user with a great passion for YPPedia. Her first edits were good faith, and ever since she has always improved as an editor. Since her self-nomination, Addyrielle has done over 5,000 edits over a period of three months. I believe Addyrielle should get the mop so she can expand her wiki knowledge even more to do administrative tasks. Thank you Addyrielle for your contributions and good luck in your RfA. Addihockey (talk•contribs) 23:34, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept! Thanks!!! =D Adrielle ♥ =) 23:57, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Support
- Support as I am nominator. --Addihockey (talk•contribs) 23:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support - I've been helping her a lot since her last RfA, and I think she's made significant progress in that time. I'm almost afraid of how fast she picks up on things. =Þ --Belthazar451 12:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Addyrielle is a dedicated editor of the wiki and I think she will make a great admin. --Lizzie 13:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Addyrielle puts a lot of energy into YPPedia and has shown the ability to stay calm in discussions. --Alfwyn 14:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Addyrielle has made a substantial improvement since her last RfA and I am happy to support this one. She has been quick to learn and shown improvements in her technical edits. -- Cedarwings (talk) 16:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support, although I have to rely on Alfwyn's statement due to the incredible amount of edits. I also like her ditw page. --Kamuflaro 18:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Addyrielle has shown great improvement in the last few months and displays positive traits that would make her well suited as an administrator. -- Muffynz(t/c) 18:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Editor has shown great improvement in wiki skills and has great dedication to improving the YPPedia, in particular providing building images. -- Faulkston 06:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support - She has made alot of great edits and i love her user page. From what i seen she would make a great admin :) --randompanzy 01:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I would like to help out with anything and everything! In addition to continuing the tasks I do already, I would love to be able to update the current events page, and pages like the refer a friend article. I would also like to be able to delete old revisions of images, because this would make it easier for me to clean up after myself when I am uploading updated versions of images. I would like to continue learning as much as I can about all aspects of wiki editing, and would also like to continue to share my knowledge and experience, and use these things to help out other users - especially those who are new. Adrielle ♥ =) 00:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I am pleased with my work updating and creating wanted crew, artistic forum event (eg. Art:Gitmo needs an avatar! 500+ doubs), flag, island, building and pirate pages. I am pleased with these because they help to fill in bits of the YPP information net that would have otherwise been absent or outdated. For similar reasons, I am pleased with my work cleaning up articles in the clean up category, updating the avatar artist directory, and improving the quality of various articles by adjusting grammar, spelling and wording. I am also proud of my pirate's page because it was the first page I ever edited (on my old account of Ezmerelda_M). It is still a work in progress! Lastly, I am pleased with this little page, and that I learned how to make trinket colour charts yesterday. Adrielle ♥ =) 00:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Promoted: 4/1/0 26 January 2009 --Muffynz
Alfwyn
Vote here (4/1/0) ending 03:55 01/26/08 (UTC)
Alfwyn (talk • contribs) – Alfwyn is an extremely adept editor. His knowledge of templates and general wiki coding is very impressive and he would be a fantastic asset to the YPPedia as an administrator. -- Muffynz(t/c) 03:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Yes, I accept. --Alfwyn 12:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Support
- Barrister 05:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC) -- I enthusiastically support this nomination. Alfwyn is well-suited for adminship with quality edits and good temperament.
- I agree with Barrister's sentiment. His wikimarkup skills and his ability to remain calm during discussions will be an asset to YPPedia. His willingness to listen to new information and use it to correct mistakes, such as in the issues that cropped up with the Hen.jpg issue, also show the attitude of a good administrator. --Guppymomma 14:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Quite knowledgeable about the way MediaWiki works, I've been quite impressed by some of the template improvements Alfwyn has done. --Thunderbird 07:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think he done good. "What they said" sums it up nicely. =) --Belthazar451 09:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
- User doesn't comprehend the naming format of picture images. An example is Alfwyn's defense to save Image:Hen from deletion although it was misnamed; and misnaming it(wrong size) again to conflict with the creation of Hendrix.-- Haywoodx(t/c) 06:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. Helping with page deletion. Maintainance of protected templates if the need arises.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. The initial prototyping of the templates and creation of the color charts for three color trinkets. It was a missing wanted feature and I learned quite a bit about gimp in the process. Also my ongoing effort on cleaning up crew/flag/pirate pages.
Promoted: 6/0/2 25 January 2009 --Muffynz
Belthazar451
Vote here (6/0/2) ending 03:55 1/25/09 (UTC)
Belthazar451 (talk • contribs) – Belthazar451 has been a contributing member of the YPPedia community for some time now. During the course of these last few months, it has been my pleasure to watch him grow as an editor. His skills with templates and general wiki editing are quite extensive and he is an asset to our editing community. -- Muffynz(t/c) 07:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I accept. --Belthazar451 09:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Support
- Yaten talk 08:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC) -- Belthazar451 has become an extremely adept editor and asset to YPPedia.
- Faulkston 05:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC) -- Candidate has progressed very well to his current high level of editing ability. He is very helpful to those new to editing.
- Barrister 17:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Belthazar451 has become a high-quality contributor to YPPedia. He has shown good judgment when dealing with issues that have not yet reached consensus.
- Kamuflaro 21:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC) -- Belthazar451 does a variety of edits and has a sense of politeness.
- Addison 23:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC) -- I believe that Belthazar451 should be an administrator because he has shown very good judgment in 99% of situations and has a wide variety of high-quality edits. He is also very good when he answers questions posted on his talk page. If he becomes an administrator I believe that it will be a great addition to the administrator list.
- Randompanzy 20:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC) -- I believe that Belthazar would make a good administrator because he has worked hard as a editor of this wiki and is always there to help people out :)
Oppose
Neutral
- --Thunderbird 03:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC) I haven't had all that much time to watch anybody lately, so I don't have any real opinion here.
- --Featherfin 10:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC) I cannot vote either way on the candidate, as my experience of his edits and attitude is mostly from last year or the year before.
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. The sysop chore I most see myself helping with is image management, such as deleting outdated versions, especially since I do a lot of image uploading myself. It'll also be handy to be able to modify out-dated but protected articles and images.
- Commenting on this: Be aware that we are not permitted to modify Official namespace pages without permission, except to correct spelling errors. I'm pointing this out since Official pages comprise probably 99% of the protected pages. --Thunderbird 03:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Aye, but not 100%. =) --Belthazar451 03:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Commenting on this: Be aware that we are not permitted to modify Official namespace pages without permission, except to correct spelling errors. I'm pointing this out since Official pages comprise probably 99% of the protected pages. --Thunderbird 03:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- A. The sysop chore I most see myself helping with is image management, such as deleting outdated versions, especially since I do a lot of image uploading myself. It'll also be handy to be able to modify out-dated but protected articles and images.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. 2008 Halloween events, Cursed Isles and Template:BlockadeTOC are, I think, some of my best contributions, and, to a slightly lesser extent (in the sense that all I had to do was wiki formatting) Template:Map:Malachite Ocean and assorted other maps. I couldn't honestly say why I'm particularly pleased about them, save that they give me a warm fuzzy feeling inside. =)
Promoted (5/0/0) August 28, 2007 --Guppymomma
Kgarrett1969
Vote here (5/0/0) ending 03:55 August 29, 2007 (UTC)
Kgarrett1969 (talk • contribs) – Kgarrett1969 is a skilled editor whose constant committment to keeping crew and flag pages up-to-date and work on trinket templates (specifically BKs) are just an addition to his joyful participation and leadership which would make for a good, well balanced administrator. -- Cedarwings (t/c) 16:51, 22 August 2007 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Accept --Kgarrett1969 07:21, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
Support
- He shows a great diversity of extremely useful edits that need doing that no one else seems to be willing to do. -- Thefirstdude (t/c) 08:00, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- Hawkings' editing & English skills coupled with enthusiastic wiki participation are all highly desirable assets in an admin. His attitude, in regards to being both willing to work and willing to learn, is a big bonus as well. --Guppymomma 08:02, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- I concur with the aforementioned statements. Hawkins has contributed many fine edits in numerous categories and has a great combination of leadership skills and editing knowledge to bring to an admin position for the wiki. In other words: Heartily endorse yadda, yadda, yadda... --Muffynz
- See my comments above. Strongly support! -- Cedarwings (t/c) 11:47, 25 August 2007 (PDT)
- Strong support - I agree with all of the above - nothing more to add! Nice work Hawkings. --Zava 19:54, 25 August 2007 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. Helping keep Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion cleaned up as well as watch for articles that probably don't need to be deleted. --Kgarrett1969 05:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- B. I anticipating using the rollback feature to remove vandalism and unnecessary edits. --Kgarrett1969 05:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- C. Continue to act as the "Patron Saint" of Crew information pages especially in the area of merging duplicate entries. I anticipate this would include helping maintain the protected crew infobox template. --Kgarrett1969 05:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- D. Helping with the removal of old versions of YPPedia images that can be removed after new version have been uploaded.
- E. Any other area that may need an Administrator as a sponser to oversee and guide other editors. --Kgarrett1969 05:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. {{Infobox crew}} (Usage) template - I origianlly set up this template, which has since become one of the most used templates of the YPPedia. --Kgarrett1969 05:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- B. Carpentry Tutorial - I receive great pleasure that this article has helped many pirates improve their carpentry skills. --Kgarrett1969 05:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- C. Crew Sample Page - I redesigned this to be easier for new editors to be able to easily set up crew articles that follows informal standards for crew pages. --Kgarrett1969 05:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- D. Foot Brawl 2006 Trinket Color Chart - This one was not difficult but I'm proud of it because it took a lot of perserverance and coordination with pirates from all the oceans to get this buit. --Kgarrett1969 05:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- E. Category:Outdated Crew Information - Probably my single greatest contribution to the YPPedia has been updating out of date crew pages. I've not only been updating information but I have also been implementing standard formatting, adding relavent history, cleaning up poor grammar, adding missing information and generally trying to enhance crew articles in general. I have easily updated well over 500 crew pages during my editing career. --Kgarrett1969 05:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
Promoted: 6/0/0 15 August 2007 --Guppymomma
Muffynz
Vote here (6/0/0) ending 03:55 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Muffynz (talk • contribs) – Muffynz is a strongly skilled editor whose contributions to articles, images, and templates added together with his enthusiastic participation & leadership would make a good, balanced addition to the list of administrators. --Guppymomma 05:39, 10 August 2007 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept. Thank you for the nomination.
Support
- I will condense everything I would like to say into this: Muffynz is an indispensable and irreplaceable member of this community. -- Thefirstdude (t/c) 08:06, 10 August 2007 (PDT)
- Excellent admin candidate! Substantial wiki know-how combined with a friendly & helpful personality. --Zava 16:53, 10 August 2007 (PDT)
- The candidate has made numerous quality edits and has been very helpful. -- Faulkston 12:51, 11 August 2007 (PDT)
- An excellent choice for an admin. Numerous quality edits, good leadership. -- Cedarwings (t/c) 14:03, 11 August 2007 (PDT)
- Meets my personal list of contributions and qualities desirable in administrators. --Featherfin 15:26, 12 August 2007 (PDT)
- My comments are already above! --Guppymomma 20:21, 13 August 2007 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
- Contributions also include earlier ones under Pianoman1125 (talk • contribs).
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. Well, right now I am working steadily through uploading a bunch of images to the YPPedia to fill out our {{My trinkets}} (Usage) template. My goal is to keep collecting those until all of them are done. In addition, I usually have a knack for spotting template mistakes, spelling and grammar mistakes, or incorrect information fairly well in a large article and would work to make sure those are fixed as fast as possible. And the ability to have an easy rollback, especially when I am experimenting with some of the more complex templates, will certainly come in handy.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. Now this is a tough one. Probably the article that I put the most work into researching and writing was the one on Notorious Fandango shortly after they disbanded. I spent about a month to a month and a half interviewing the members of it to make sure that the article was as complete as possible. Also, I'm pretty proud on the three tutorials I have written for the YPPedia; Gem running, merchanting, and duty navigation tutorial; for their completeness and example that I can insert images into articles without breaking things.
Promoted (3/0/0) March 9, 2007 --Thunderbird
Amoyer
Vote here (3/0/0) ending 03:55 08/03/2007 (UTC)
Amoyer (talk • contribs) – I have been playing Puzzle Pirates since August 2005 and have been regularly editing on the Yppedia since September 2006. I feel that the Yppedia is a fantasic resource for all pirates new and old experienced. I have learned a lot from the experienced users on how to better edit pages, make better use of templates and am always willing to learn more. I would like to use my knowledge and experience of the game and Yppedia to assist others and being an admin would help me do that. And having access to the revert button would be a big help too! Cedarwings 15:04, 1 March 2007 (PST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept (although I guess it was assumed)-- Cedarwings (t/c) 09:23, 9 March 2007 (PST)
Support
- I support this nomination with one minor reservation. Amoyer has shown dedication and a general high caliber of edits. However, I have a minor concern about experience with regards to policy issues. A recent example can be found here. This not a big deal, but I think the candidate should be aware that there's room for growth in this area. --Barrister 18:34, 7 March 2007 (PST)
- Amoyer has performed good work in creating wanted pages and updating existing crew and flag articles. -- Faulkston 20:12, 7 March 2007 (PST)
- Amoyer has taken an active role in recent times. The candidate's continued assistance as an administrator will be invaluable. Yaten talk 04:47, 8 March 2007 (PST)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I am willing to help wherever needed, especially getting vandalism quickly address, deleting pages following redirection for in-game capitalization fixes and upkeeping the policies on user pages. I would also like to see the number of wanted pages decreased and will continue to address this as well as keeping the recent changes on track.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I have been working on making sure that all of the buildings on the Cobalt ocean have pages, they are up-to-date, and have screenshot. I am about half-way through this process. You can see my progress here.
Promoted: 5/0/0 15 December 2006 --Guppymomma
Faulkston
Vote here (5/0/0) ending 22:00 PM (UTC) on the 17th of December)
Faulkston (talk • contribs) – Faulkston has demonstrated incredible competence with mediawiki, and I feel that access to the various administrator tools and privileges will add further convenience to what he already does quite well. (Indeed, he already does more "patrolling" than most of the "official" administrators!) - Ponytailguy 13:58, 10 December 2006 (PST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Thank you, I accept. -- Faulkston 15:42, 10 December 2006 (PST)
Support
- Support, as per nomination. --Ponytailguy 15:58, 10 December 2006 (PST)
- Support --Barrister 02:06, 11 December 2006 (PST)
- Support --Nicksterv (t/c) 02:51, 11 December 2006 (PST)
- Support --Lizzie 04:27, 11 December 2006 (PST)
- Support - already thought he was an admin he did that much! --Whitemonkey 09:49, 11 December 2006 (PST)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I would likely be helping with page deletion, in particular the unnecessary redirection pages created when I move articles to match in-game capitalization. It seems like I do a lot of that type of renaming. I think though that I will have to learn a lot from the administration rulings to be of any help in that area. For the near future I am likely to maintain templates, handle recentchanges rollbacks, fix category sorting and attempt to reduce the number of articles marked for cleanup. Aside from accessing locked templates to debug odd errors (some of which have occurred in the crew infobox recently), it wouldn't be a large extension to what I'm currently doing.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. The Economy diagram, commonly discussed ideas pages, time chart entry templates are my contributions which I particularly like. The economy diagram started out as an exercise to see if it were even possible to produce a graphical index for the economy, since a number of players had expressed the difficulty they had in navigating the YPPedia through existing text indices. It worked a lot better than I had anticipated. The commonly discussed ideas pages are, I hope, just as useful to others as they are to me in organizing the huge amount of material in the Game Design forum. I know they have saved me from having to constantly rescan forum search results. The time chart entry templates took a while to get right but were a great learning experience in working with nested templates and possibly more importantly, creating clear instructions for using a template.
Promoted: 6/0/0 14 November 2005 --Guppymomma
Lizzie
Vote here (6/0/0) ending 03:55 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Lizzie (talk • contribs) - Lizzie has a good history of helpful edits. She is not shy about asking questions when she needs help and readily shares this information with others. The same good, level-headed attitude is also shown in her discussions with other editors. Her knowledge of the game, from gameplay to history to event running, is also a bonus. --Guppymomma 22:03, 7 November 2006 (PST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
- I accept, and thank you for the nomination! :)
Support
- Strongly support. Some seriously good work there. --Flamer 07:38, 8 November 2006 (PST)
- Support. Good solid range of edits, content generation and long-term dedication to the YPPedia. --Featherfin 12:37, 8 November 2006 (PST)
- See my nomination notes for my comments. --Guppymomma 15:39, 8 November 2006 (PST)
- Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. --Ponytailguy 17:15, 8 November 2006 (PST)
- Lots of good work and plenty substantial edits over a long time. --Angelbeaver (talk) 05:43, 11 November 2006 (PST)
- Support. Excellent contributions. --Nicksterv (t/c) 15:36, 11 November 2006 (PST)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- I'm quite happy to do whatever is needed. Now that the initial rush of my new job is over, I'm quite keen to go back to doing a lot of active editing, specifically clean-up, wanted pages, that kind of thing, to keep the Wiki a truly useful resource. I think the fact I live in the UK - and can work on the wiki during the day - means I'm potentially covering a empty time slot to remedy vandalism, etc.
- 2.Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I'm quite pleased with my efforts to create historically important pages such as Thanos, Pennsuedo, Fronsac, Dittemuzz, the Four Hour War, and of course my own pirate page ;). I think history is such a huge part of this game and I intend to continue adding to these historical pages - and others - so all the cool stuff from the past isn't forgotten!.
Promoted: 6/0/0 31 October 2006 --Guppymomma
Piplicus
Vote here (6/0/0) ending 03:55 22:05 November 1st 2006 (UTC) (UTC)
Piplicus (talk • contribs) – I've been using the YPPedia for a few months and think that it is the best resource to ever hit the game, and I always like contributing back as much as possible to resources I borrow from. I do tend to make a lot of ad-hoc edits (random page surfing and correcting any erros I notice). I like using the wiki markup, and am now confident with quite a lot of the syntax, although I do make quite a few harmless blunders from time to time. Piplicus 15:08, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept, by definition.
Support
- I have nothing but praise for Piplicus, whose understanding of wiki markup and complex wiki matters is top-notch. His forum and in-game actions show his excellence at dispute resolution, something important in an administrator. Yaten talk 20:17, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
- I echo all of Yaten's sentiments about Pip's superb wiki markup & organization knowledge and his demeanor in disputes. His record in running the long term set of Booty or No Booty also speaks toward his level of responsibility & reliability. --Guppymomma 07:51, 26 October 2006 (PDT)
- Echoing the above comments I support wholeheartedly. --Angelbeaver (talk) 07:59, 26 October 2006 (PDT)
- I have full confidence in Pip's technical knowledge and his level-headed demeanor. --Zava 04:24, 31 October 2006 (PST)
- I've been impressed both Pip's initiative, his ability to step back and ask for help and guidance when needed, and his ability to give guidance when asked.--Fiddler 07:39, 31 October 2006 (PST)
- Piplicus is a technically-adept editor with a long history of commitment and good sense, both in and out of game. --AtteSmythe 09:26, 31 October 2006 (PST)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I'm not quite sure. Whatever I feel like helping with, or if I'm asked to do something. I'll police myself with adding categories more, for sure.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. Definitely the Booty or No Booty domain. I've put a huge amount of hours into writing it; even though it's not kept perfectly to date.
Promoted (4/0/0) 15 July 2006 --Thunderbird
atteSmythe
Vote here (4/0/0) ending 03:55 15:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC) (UTC)
atteSmythe (talk • contribs) – When I poked him about it, he said he'd accept, so as they say, pressure++ --Emufarmers 08:43, 8 July 2006 (PDT)
- I accept, thank you. --AtteSmythe 15:10, 8 July 2006 (PDT)
Support
- Support. AtteSmythe's work on all manner of things has been helpful. He voices his opinion in a level-headed logical manner while still keeping an open ear to listening to other sides; and he goes along with the decisions made by community consensus even if his opinion differed. His method of helping folks to figure out what to add to pirate articles by asking questions has been nicely encouraging and the cleanup project has been a wonderful rallying of the community. --Guppymomma 19:04, 9 July 2006 (PDT)
- Support. AtteSmythe is a mature and knowledgable player with great experience from his time as admin of the Game Design forum.--Fiddler 19:40, 10 July 2006 (PDT)
- Support. AtteSmythe has made significant, high-quality contributions. His maturity and judgment makes him a great choice for adminship. --Barrister 13:54, 11 July 2006 (PDT)
- Support. Great technical ability, diplomatic skills. Good knowledge of social context, excellent content generation, overall a fantastic ambassador for the YPPedia. --Featherfin 10:01, 12 July 2006 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. This is a difficult one, because 99% of what needs to be done to keep a wiki running can be done by anyone, and the other 1% aren't really enviable duties. Still, administratorship would allow me to help share the load of deletion requests and recentchanges rollback, as well as by letting me take care of trivial maintenance (especially to my User: subpages) without adding to the admin load. To answer the question directly, there's no task on the list which I'm unwilling to tackle, though I'd have to start following the arbitration/administration rulings for a while before I felt comfortable with that side of the affair.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. Most recently, the push for pirate page editing and completion. In the near future, the Cleanup Crew is my baby, and I'd still like to make it something that enacts real changes on at least a weekly rotation. In the distant past, I'm probably most proud of my work in extracting and archiving images for the island pages. I most enjoy the template work I've done, perhaps because it's most like coding, and the changes are both immediate and potentially widespread.
Promoted 5/0/0 19 June 2006 --Guppymomma
Zava
Vote here (5/0/0) ending 03:55 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Zava (talk • contribs) – Zava has a long history of sound edits on the wiki, as well as content creation. She involves herself in as many discussions as possible and always yields to consensus on sticky matters. She is one of the most active editors in keeping Sage history and pages up to date. Her knowledge and experience with the wiki makes her a great candidate for adminship. Fannon 14:59, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept!
Support
- Nominated her! --Fannon 15:00, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- Yes, yes, yes, a thousand times yes. --Ponytailguy 15:08, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- Long-standing commitment to the YPPedia, good variety of contributions, high technical knowledge, forum experience and diplomacy; a great ambassador for the YPPedia. She wins my vote. --Featherfin 11:38, 13 June 2006 (PDT)
- Support. Zava's knowledge, Sage-leanings, even temperment and willingness to ask about things she doesn't know/isn't sure about will be an asset to the wiki. --Guppymomma 19:44, 16 June 2006 (PDT)
- Support. She's been around for ages and I've had nothing but pleasant experiences in dealing with her. --Yaten talk 22:10, 16 June 2006 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
- Guys, I know you're all eager to vote on this, but I poked around Wikipedia for info on this process; I found this. Turns out you're supposed to wait until the person accepts the nomination before adding it to the RfA section and/or voting on it (to keep people from feeling pressured and such). Just something we should probably consider next time. :) --Emufarmers 15:33, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- Although our policies are modeled after Wikipedia, they are not all specifically adhering to everything on Wikipedia. While it wasn't noted in the text, I believe since Zava has previously declined nomination, that Fannon spoke with Zava beforehand to see if she would accept it this time. Our YPPedia community is small enough that there's no need to stand on ceremony and I don't think that anyone would actually accept adminhood out of peer pressure of a few support votes. --Guppymomma 16:06, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- Fair enough: I saw that Zava had declined previously, and I didn't know if Fannon had spoken to her beforehand; I don't know if any of us are particularly susceptible to peer pressure, but it's always hard to have two people vote yes for you, and then to say you're not interested. We're only human, after all. :P --Emufarmers 16:11, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- Although our policies are modeled after Wikipedia, they are not all specifically adhering to everything on Wikipedia. While it wasn't noted in the text, I believe since Zava has previously declined nomination, that Fannon spoke with Zava beforehand to see if she would accept it this time. Our YPPedia community is small enough that there's no need to stand on ceremony and I don't think that anyone would actually accept adminhood out of peer pressure of a few support votes. --Guppymomma 16:06, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I do feel it's my duty to step in and explain (or give people a hand) if they seem to need it, but in the past I've been careful to let people make the changes themself so they can learn how the wiki works. I also expect I'll continue to patrol Recent Changes as usual, just with a revert button in hand rather then doing things manually.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I am pleased with the periodic updates of the Sage pages, coupled with in-game nudging of prominent Sage players. This includes the familiar listings, crew and flag pages, and island pages. I've also (slowly) been working on adding images and information to pages that are lacking - Examples are all the exterior images of housing, the governor page, and the image showing how to create a flag. It's an ongoing project to document and fact-check the parts of the game few people see as well as quirky UI things like the create-a-flag location.
Promoted 5/0/0 11 June 2006 --Thunderbird
Featherfin
Vote here (5/0/0) ending 03:55 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Featherfin (talk • contribs) – A frequent contributor with a level head on his shoulders. Fiddler 05:54, 4 June 2006 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept. In a recent discussion regarding administrators, I commented on how I felt there wasn't really a need for any new administrators. However, I'd like to accept this nomination, as I'm grateful to Orsino (Fiddler) for acknowledging my long-standing commitment to the YPPedia - please read my comments below. --Featherfin 07:03, 4 June 2006 (PDT)
Support
- Support. Featherfin's contributions to the wiki have been many and valuable. He has an excellent ability to speak clearly during heated debate without letting his passions overrun his judgement.--Fiddler 06:15, 4 June 2006 (PDT)
- Support. FF has worked hard to write fact based articles on difficult subjects, collaborating even with former opponents in order to get multiple viewpoints. His willingness to do everything from minor edits to updating infoboxes to writing full historical accounts of people & events is an asset to the wiki. --Guppymomma 17:11, 7 June 2006 (PDT)
- Support. Featherfin has a history of solid contributions, most notably his content creation where historic articles were lacking. He has always remained calm during heated debates, and will do well as a moderator when it is needed. He easily meets my standards for adminship. --Fannon 17:13, 7 June 2006 (PDT)
- Support. Maybe I’m just a sucker for his grammar (certainly some of the best on the wiki), or maybe it’s that I get his contributions confused with those of Fannon and Fiddler (we’ll have three admins with an “F” name? I’ll never keep it straight!), but looking at him now, the thing which impresses me most is his willingness to move past whatever grudges he might have held, and quickly. (He mentioned both me and Sagacious by name below, and while I haven’t had that much direct interaction with him either way, I know he’s had some less-than-positive encounters with Sagacious in the past, so his mentioning us by name shows a good deal of tact and sense. Plus, I like seeing my name.) Beyond that, he’s got plenty of wiki work, particularly in the aforementioned history department. He’s a shoo-in, as I see it. --Emufarmers 20:48, 7 June 2006 (PDT)
- Support. I have seen Featherfin around the wiki alot making lots of good contributions and general page cleaning. Yohohobob
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. In light of the recent debates over the nature of pirate articles, I have become inspired to begin an ongoing project designed to actively attempt to record the history of the game in a social/political context, whilst players from the earlier days are still around. I would use my role as an ambassador of the YPPedia to keep the wiki in contact with the rest of the Y!PP community, pushing for a wider base of contributors and actively targeting and seeking people who could possibly help develop pages on specific historical events or characters. This project will go ahead irrespective of the outcome of my adminship nomination. :) I envision a role for myself based on maintaining the quality of new content produced in light of the prospective policy changes - users such as Sagacious and Emufarmers have already proven time and time again that you don't need to have admin powers to be able to do a good job cleaning up a page or highlighting its faults. The ability to temporarily protect pages would be useful in the more delicate situations, for example the History of Imperio debate.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I'm pleased with my ongoing work with Jacktheblack on the Scallywag War as an example of how two people on opposing sides of a very bitter conflict can work together to produce an accurate and unbiased historical article. Related to that project are my work on The By-laws of The Ruby Ring and the Scallywag War Timeline. I also enjoyed writing Chihiro, Ironfisted, Pjotr and Shark's biographies, and Fannon's biography which Zava then refined. My historical contributions to Avalon, Imperio and the Crimperio Alliance page is an example of the sort of content my project will aim to develop. I created the Island Designer box for personal pirate pages [1] and will be making art pages for each specific island design contest after my final exam this Wednesday. I've also continually contributed to Ransack Marauders and Silver Dawn but those are very much group projects.
Promoted: 4/0/2 20 May 2006 --Guppymomma
Ponytailguy
Vote here (4/0/2) ending 03:55 May 20th (UTC)
Ponytailguy (talk • contribs) – Frankly, I just want the revert button. I'll admit that my wiki markup is shaky at best, but I don't think I've ever broken a page, I've made signifigant contributions to a fair number of pages, and while I don't have much in the way of adminship aspirations, that revert button is mighty tempting. I've also helped a few people set up events or use the wiki for the first time, but that's something I do anyway. I never know what to put in these things, and I feel bad enough having self-nominated, so I'll quit while I'm ahead. Ponytailguy 16:57, 13 May 2006 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Self-nomination, so naturally, darling. --Ponytailguy 17:02, 13 May 2006 (PDT)
Support
- Ponytailguy's contributions to the wiki have been solid and diverse. His game experience is certainly broad, if not as long as many of the other administrators. While we have clashed in the past on ocassion regarding some issues, his commitment to improving the wiki, his demonstrable ability to work with groups, and his increasing maturity and skill at avoiding and smoothing over confrontation have garnered him my vote.--Fiddler 20:30, 13 May 2006 (PDT)
- I echo Fiddler's sentiments. Ponytailguy has definitely improved his previously more abrasive demeanor and honed his wiki skills in a very community consensus kind of way. There's always room for improvement and I believe that he will continue to mature even more. He's also attempted to add small touches to various templates & things that help make the wiki a friendlier spot that gently encourages newcomers to learn more & get involved in the correct way (even if they started in the wrong way). --Guppymomma 21:03, 13 May 2006 (PDT)
- Ponytailguy has a strong, substantial list of contributions throughout all namespaces and has shown a helpful attitude for several months. My experiences in the game, on the forums, and on the wiki with him have been positive, and I can't see any reason to oppose his adminship request. --Yaten talk 19:17, 14 May 2006 (PDT)
- I echo the above statements. —Sivius(T/C) 15:25, 15 May 2006 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
- While Teeg certainly exhibits plenty of Admin qualities, and has a level of grammar which impresses me, the tentativeness of his request means that I can't really support it; the revert button is nice, but it's just a minor implement of convenience: It's not a big enough thing to seek adminship over. Still, because I think Teeg would do just fine as an Admin anyway, I won't oppose it. I guess it comes down to whether Adminship is something is something which should be limited to those who would use its privilages liberally and effectively, or should be extended to those who wouldn't use it much, but would never abuse it (I'm not sure how I fall on that). --Emufarmers 17:13, 13 May 2006 (PDT)
- If anything, though, I would suggest that the fact that the adminship wouldn't change a whole lot about how I use the wiki is somewhat of a good thing... I already do a lot of productive stuff that I've been recognized for, and I'm willing to shoulder some admin duties, but my heart lies with content creation as opposed to shifting maps or doing massive rename projects. Feel free to change your vote to "Oppose because he doesn't like the boring administrative stuff", but that's where I stand. :) --Ponytailguy 17:19, 13 May 2006 (PDT)
- Good quality edits, but nothing to make Teeg stand out from the crowd, in my books. --Featherfin 06:51, 14 May 2006 (PDT)
Comments
- You don't need the revert button to revert, just edit a previous revision and save it without making any changes. --Thunderbird 17:10, 13 May 2006 (PDT)
- I'm aware of this, as my contrib log should indicate. Call me lazy, I guess. --Ponytailguy 17:14, 13 May 2006 (PDT)
- So there's a couple of you out there who I know for a fact have read this, but haven't voted yet. And that scares me. Please don't get me wrong... if you're just collecting your thoughts, or don't want to vote until you've really sat down and assessed my contribs log, or whatever else, take your time. But one of you in particular I think is holding back because they don't want to hurt my feelings. And honestly, I'd rather know what people think of me and what I need to improve than have my emotions sheltered. Please, go ahead and vote, even if you're voting against me. I'm a big boy, I can take it ;) --Ponytailguy 18:26, 14 May 2006 (PDT)
- Patience, grasshopper =P. --Thunderbird 19:16, 14 May 2006 (PDT)
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. The usual stuff. Tracking recent changes, fixing templates, helping with visual appearance and aesthetics, and catching and correcting ambiguous phrasing. (Which is actually probably where the bulk of my real wiki experience is)
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. Well, in terms of pure writing and content generation, I like what I've done with event and bakeoff. I'm also responsible for the duty/carousing/labour puzzle templates (which, if nothing else, illustrates that I can create and use templates and wiki markup attractively and efficiently.) and I've added signifigant portions to the puzzle standing page. My current (but slow) project is captaincy, which I'm working on as things come to me, but I'm proud of so far. I've also assembled a bunch of tutorials like the one for 3DS-Max that Guppy used to assemble the rendered eggs for Prometheus' egg design event, as well as the wiki tips for event planners, which is more general but still quite thorough, and sounds like it might be going into the official event toolkit in one form or another.
Promoted: 8/0/0 07 March 2006 --Guppymomma
Fannon
Vote here (8/0/0) ending 03:55 March 13th (UTC)
Fannon (talk • contribs) – To perhaps oversimplify, she knows her stuff. She's been a consistantly good editor, and has shown she's very adept at both original contributions and the "boring" administrative functions and edits. It logically follows that the additional administrative tools can only help her do what she already doe quite well, even better. Teeg 17:11, 6 March 2006 (PST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept.
Support
- Guppymomma 20:45, 6 March 2006 (PST) - Fannon's work on infoboxes has been especially helpful and her obsessive cleaning up of articles is excellent as well. She also sets a great example in not being shy about asking if she's not sure about something or wants to learn more about something.
- Zava 21:07, 6 March 2006 (PST) - Fannon's generally the one I pester in game about wiki questions when I'm unsure about things. She's done a great job fixing up the pages nobody else wanted to touch.
- Emufarmers 21:15, 6 March 2006 (PST) - What I have seen of Fannon's work so far has been overwhelmingly positive, and she has an extensive history of useful edits, both major and minior; since has been with YPPedia for at least six weeks, she appears to have the experience and dedication necessary for an administrative post. Although I intend on reviewing her record further, I have seen nothing but good work from her, and as such, support her nomination.
- Featherfin 23:33, 6 March 2006 (PST) - Fannon actually follows people around the wiki improving upon their contributions. She watches the various flag and crew catagories like a hawk. Giving her admin powers would only improve the general maintenance of the YPPedia.
- Support Solid contributions --Nickster (t/c) 23:37, 6 March 2006 (PST)
- Yaten talk 04:43, 7 March 2006 (PST) - Echo comments above.
- Fiddler 13:07, 7 March 2006 (PST) - Excellent work so far.
- Piplicus talk 14:00, 7 March 2006 (PST) - Ditto
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I would imagine I would have to help in reviewing edits for quality, vandilism, etc, as well as with other tasks such as deleting pages, moving pages. Also, I would obviously be willing to help other wiki editors with formating issues and the like.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I'm pleased with my work on the Cranberry Island, fleshing out the buildings and helping remove the red linkies, as well as adding the Crimson Tide page, among others. Also, I am proud of my cleanup on pages such as Shark Raiders, and in updating flag infoboxes. One of my proudest contributions is adding the italian column to the Translated phrases page, as I feel it was a unique contribution compared to the others.
Promoted: 3/0/0 4 November 2005 --Guppymomma 11:36, 4 November 2005 (PST)
Nicksterv
Vote here (3/0/0) ending 03:55 14:05 04 November 2005 (UTC)
Nicksterv (talk • contribs) – Excellent work with general cleanup and great work monitoring pages for deletion. Contributes to discussions and has several edits in the YPPedia namespace. He is often active during the part of the day when many other administrators are not. Yaten 14:04, 28 October 2005 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept. Thank you --Nickster 15:18, 28 October 2005 (PDT)
Support
- Yaten Support described above.
- Support - His monitoring skills are highly beneficial along with his wiki formatting knowledge. --Guppymomma 20:48, 28 October 2005 (PDT)
- Support - favoring yet another who likes to continue making a good thing better — Callistan (talk/contrib) 13:57, 3 November 2005 (PST)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. Dealing with CSD requests and cleaning up pages.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I can't think of anything in particular at the moment.
Promoted: 3/0/0 4 November 2005 --Guppymomma 11:36, 4 November 2005 (PST)
Zyborg22
Vote here (3/0/0) ending 03:55 14:05 04 November 2005 (UTC)
Zyborg22 (talk • contribs) – Zyborg has done great work with general cleanup and adds excellent new material. I've been particularly impressed with his image contributions for portrait and 2005 Halloween events. Yaten 14:07, 28 October 2005 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I'll accept this nomination.
Support
- Yaten Support comments above.
- Support - His careful watching of edits and doing of edits is wonderful. Willingness to work cooperatively is also great. --Guppymomma 20:46, 28 October 2005 (PDT)
- Support - favoring yet another who likes to continue making a good thing better — Callistan (talk/contrib) 13:56, 3 November 2005 (PST)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I mostly see myself deleting articles and images that need to be deleted and watching other articles for inappropriate or incorrect edits.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I'm pretty pleased of the articles and images that I started or uploaded myself, mostly because I believe that I do the most work on them.
Promoted: 5/0/0 25 October 2005 – Yaten talk 19:09, 25 October 2005 (PDT)
Callistan
Vote here (5/0/0) ending 03:55 25 October, 2005 (UTC)
Callistan (talk • contribs) – Self nomination. In the past I did a large amount of work on the unofficial wiki and assisted with the migration here. I've a strong knowledge of templates and the game itself. Callistan 09:49, 18 October 2005 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support
- Support. The charting templates Callistan created have been invaluable. --Fiddler 09:52, 18 October 2005 (PDT)
- Support. Those templates are absolutely amazing. --Guppymomma 10:00, 18 October 2005 (PDT)
- Support. High quality contributions, and yes, that includes the charting templates. --Barrister 10:05, 18 October 2005 (PDT)
- Support. Besides his excellent coding work, Callistan's other judgement calls have been very reasonable, IMO. --AtteSmythe 11:26, 18 October 2005 (PDT)
- Support. Echo comments above. – Yaten talk 13:47, 18 October 2005 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. General editing of new articles, as well as cleanup/clarification in existing ones. Improvments to layouts and templates, and edits for consistency.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I'd have to say the Chart Templates were the most satisfying. It was very entertaining to work past the technical issues that were involved, and learn more about wiki templates. I think it provides a nice visual to help relate game geography.
Promoted: 2/0/0 7 October 2005 --Guppymomma
Thunderbird
Vote here (2/0/0) ending 03:55 [00:01, 7 October 2005 (UTC)] (UTC)
Thunderbird (talk • contribs) – He has a careful reading eye and fairly watches for adherence to current policies, starting discussions to ensure that any differences of opinion are openly discussed so all parties know what's going on. His knowledge of both the subscriber and doubloon oceans is excellent. Guppymomma 17:04, 30 September 2005 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:Accepted --Thunderbird 19:11, 30 September 2005 (PDT)
Support
- Guppymomma 17:04, 30 September 2005 (PDT) - see my comments above.
- Yaten 20:07, 30 September 2005 (PDT) – has quickly adapted and is a great resource with excellent game knowledge.
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I don't see myself doing anything major, just mainly reverting improper edits and tossing stuff according to policy (or articles that get created by mistake due to screwups).
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I can't think of any off the top of my head at the moment.
Promoted: 3/0/0 04 October 2005 --Guppymomma
Fiddler
Vote here (3/0/0) ending 03:55 [04 October 2005] (UTC)
Fiddler (talk • contribs) – Fiddler has done amazing work on many areas of the wiki. His tireless work watching which articles should and shouldn't be here is impressive. He is also an excellent resource as a player with Viridian experience. Yaten 20:38, 27 September 2005 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I accept. --Fiddler 16:08, 28 September 2005 (PDT)
Support
- Yaten 20:39, 27 September 2005 (PDT) – see above comments.
- Barrister 15:28, 28 September 2005 (PDT)
- Guppymomma 15:29, 28 September 2005 (PDT) - Fiddler's work has been excellent and his doubloon knowledge (and willingness to test things out for the sake of the wiki) combine well with his categorization of pages obsession.
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. I'd like to continue my work in keeping vanity articles and edits under control and I'd like to continue the work I started in keeping the wiki categorized.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I'm quite pleased with how Starting out has developed into an excellent guide for beginning players. Also, I'm rather proud of my work at categorizing the uncategorized pages, and at my attempts to create a set of categories for the beginning player.
Promoted: 4/0/0 04 October 2005 --Yaten
Guppymomma
Vote here (4/0/0) ending 03:55 [04 October 2005] (UTC)
Guppymomma (talk • contribs) – Guppymomma has been an excellent editor from the start of the unofficial wiki. She is excellent at patrolling the Recent changes, often reverting inappropriate edits within five minutes. I've been particularly impressed with her clever template designs and housing/furniture work. Yaten 20:20, 27 September 2005 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Accepted. Guppymomma 20:36, 27 September 2005 (PDT)
Support
- – Yaten talk 20:21, 27 September 2005 (PDT) – comments above.
- Barrister 15:26, 28 September 2005 (PDT)
- --Fiddler 05:05, 29 September 2005 (PDT)
- --Thunderbird 13:57, 1 October 2005 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. As mentioned above, I'm all for obsessively hitting reload on Recent changes to help patrol edits for necessary rollbacks. I'm also big on customizing the Mediawiki pages which create things like the left side nav bar.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. The unificiation of various templates so that they work for all oceans with referencing to a single set of ocean templates for header & link styles. I'm also partial to the blockade coordination tutorial contentwise because I think it's a useful resource for flags that are looking to get into blockading.
Promoted: 4/0/0 04 October 2005 --Guppymomma
Yaten
Vote here (4/0/0) ending 03:55 04 October 2005 (UTC)
Yaten (talk • contribs) – Yaten has done great structural and content work on both the unofficial and official wikis. He's very good with more complex templates. Guppymomma 19:54, 27 September 2005 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support
- Guppymomma 19:55, 27 September 2005 (PDT) - see comments above
- Barrister 15:19, 28 September 2005 (PDT)
- --Fiddler 05:06, 29 September 2005 (PDT)
- Thunderbird 13:58, 1 October 2005 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. Most of my sysop work has been with watching the CSD category and reverting inappropriate edits. I often do some cleanup with the image list.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. Being a fairly visual learner, I think I'm most proud of my image and template work. I think my template designs have helped create a better flow for the furniture and clothing pages, and I took great joy in seeing similar templates adapted by others for the housing pages. I'm also particularly proud of the joint effort mostly involving myself, Guppymomma, Tawnee, and Rappak starting and improving the Sage Ocean pages.
Promoted: 3/0/0 04 October 2005 --Guppymomma
Barrister
Vote here (3/0/0) ending 03:55 04 October 2005 (UTC)
Barrister (talk • contribs) – Barrister has done a large amount of work on both the unofficial & official wikis, he brings a strong sense of orderliness and knowledge of the game. Guppymomma 19:54, 27 September 2005 (PDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
- Press butan. Giv poe. -- Er, I mean, yes, I accept. Barrister 15:24, 28 September 2005 (PDT)
Support
- Guppymomma 19:56, 27 September 2005 (PDT) - see comments above
- – Yaten talk 20:33, 27 September 2005 (PDT) – Barrister has been excellent in providing guidance and a voice of reason. His blockade histories are easily one of the most widely-used historical game resources. His incredible work at general wiki improvement can be easily seen in his numerous contributions.
- --Fiddler 05:06, 29 September 2005 (PDT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A. General editing of all new articles. Tracking new construction on islands.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to YPPedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. Providing a usable namespace for islands, crews, and flags. It took a few trys to get it right, but the final version seems to be working well.