Talk:Stackable

Page layout

I think I like putting the images right of the text best, makes the text/image relation clearer. Feel free to change that however. --Alfwyn 17:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

I disagree. I'm not too sure what size your monitor is, but on my monitor, the third image is far below the text it's supposed to be illustrating, and there's large empty gaps at the top and bottom. Not really what I'd call making the text/image relation clearer. --Belthazar451 21:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Grr, that's another IE/Firefox issue it seems. Looked quite horrible with firefox, I agree. --Alfwyn 22:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

I produced a version displaying about the same on firefox/IE here. The problem with the current layout with my IE is, that there is a large gap before the second image (behaves like there is a clear right before the second image). --Alfwyn 22:32, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Maximum?

Is there a maximum number allowed in a stack? That is, what is the largest stack-size of stackable item(s)? I would presume that we'd encounter a maximum DISPLAYABLE number before any ACTUAL-inside-the-database maximum. What is the largest number displayed that anyone has captured in a screen shot? Thanks. -- Franklincain ^(t/c) 12:05, 10 August 2012 (PDT)

Courtesy of a chance encounter with an Ocean Master (on an unrelated matter), I was able to get an answer to this question tonight. After creating a stack of 100,000 RMs, she said the last zero was cut short, only showing its front half. Therefore, we should be able to see up to five entire digits displayed, for a highest possible maximum displayable of 99,999. -- Franklincain ^(t/c) 20:39, 10 August 2012 (PDT)

If it's not a monospaced font, one would assume that 111,111 would display properly even when 100,000 does not. Or maybe even 100,001. I'm not clear as to why that's an important consideration, though. That said, since 100,000 is possible, we can tell that the actual upper limit is at least 2^17. Since 17 is a weird binary index, though, it's probably greater than that. --Belthazar451 21:11, 10 August 2012 (PDT)

Potions

There has been a release in which Potions were extended to being able to have 100 of each type due to being stackable. Update needed on this page! Gunnerfreak on Cerulean 17:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Be my guest. :P --Budclare2 21:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Oi! Lol. Fine. I'll do it in the morning. :P Gunnerfreak on Cerulean 22:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Potions are a tad different (none of the pictures in the article apply to them). Maybe just note that Potions can be stacked, but work slightly differently. --Thunderbird 02:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm not sure how to link to pictures with how Potion stacking works. I'll figure it out, today, I hope. Lol. Gunnerfreak on Cerulean 10:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Usually you do it by taking screenshots in-game of whatever you want to show - crop them down to the right size and save them as PNG format (so they don't lose quality). Then upload them with a suitable filename like 'Item-stackable-potion.png' - and use the tag {{interface image}} ^(Usage) when uploading so they get tagged correctly. You can kind of see how to insert an image into an article by editing a page with images on it, like this article, and copying the same wikimarkup but just change the filename and settings. --Sagacious ^(talk) 11:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Alright, thanks guys, but I'll have to do that when college is out. :/ Silly internet won't let me logon in-game, so I'll have to open my hot spot in the afternoon. Gunnerfreak on Cerulean 11:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)