Category talk:Familiar schedules
From YPPedia
Bia redid the times. The info on this page is incorrect, see here: http://forums.puzzlepirates.com/community/mvnforum/viewthread?p=745648#745648
Days not in the month?
Older discussions are at User talk:Guppymomma/tanfamiliartest. So now for the next question. I had actually been pondering zapping the days that are for other months. They'd just be a light grey without the day numbers or events. It'll make it look cleaner and even more like normal calendars. Any thoughts on the matter? --Guppymomma 17:06, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
- I say at least try it and see what it looks like. I think it'd be nifty in a light grey. --Featherfin 17:09, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
- Easier to remove than to put in. A good idea is always a good idea. Anyhow, here's what the test one looks like: Tan familiar schedule (July 2006). --Guppymomma 17:15, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
- Grey looks shiny to me. I like it! I'd personally avoid the "th", "nd" labels, bcause I prefer numerical table calendars not to have them, it looks cleaner. --Featherfin 17:23, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
- The numbers are boring :-( Grey boxes are shiny :-) --Sagacious (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
- I believe the point is that the changes being implemented are to increase the usability of the calendar. There is no advantage to using ordinals instead of plain numbers in a month calendar. In fact, I don't know that I've ever seen an online or printed monthly calendar using them. I prefer to leave the numbers as is. --Guppymomma 17:35, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
- The numbers are boring :-( Grey boxes are shiny :-) --Sagacious (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
- Grey looks shiny to me. I like it! I'd personally avoid the "th", "nd" labels, bcause I prefer numerical table calendars not to have them, it looks cleaner. --Featherfin 17:23, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
- Easier to remove than to put in. A good idea is always a good idea. Anyhow, here's what the test one looks like: Tan familiar schedule (July 2006). --Guppymomma 17:15, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
