Talk:Unofficial Ice Blockade History

Merging Article?

What would Merging this article mean / do?

Lcawte

Merging means the unique information in this article would be added to the merge-to article - in this case, Ice blockade history - and this article itself would be deleted. --Belthazar451 08:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Oppose Merger Ok? I made this because I thought it would be good to have a record of the Outpost islands blockade history scene as it wasnt covered in the Ice blockade history. Would the ice blockade history then change completly? Another point is that the ice blockade history is correctly updated. Though I try my best to keep this updated, it does really matter. --Lcawte 22:08, 13 April 2009 (GMT)

Oppose Merger I personally dont think its a good idea because it misses some blockades, its not edited enough to be merged into the offical Ice blockade history. --Lcawte 07:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Support merger Let's merge it, the "it's not accurate enough" argument is now void because the ice blockade history page hasn't been updated in a while either. It's not ever going to be as accurate as some of the other histories, but let's keep what we have. Some users might be interested to see the figures. --Therobotdude 19:19, 15 August 2015 (PDT)

Deletion proposal

I personally don't think this page is needed. With the outpost island blockade window open 24/7, it is excessively difficult to track those blockades. Also, unless this has changed, the blockade results drop from the notice board after an hour (as opposed to three days on production oceans). There's also the fact that island owners can have the islands returned to the BKs by petitioning the OMs. How are we supposed to track that? --Thunderbird 23:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Oppose deletion To be honest I still think this page should be left alone... It is accurate enough to be kept but not enough to be merged. The point about the BK's... If that was so, the buildings pages would have to be scrapped as well. I dont know what you think you know, but Ice is a community, we work together, there are strong groups of friends in all differnet time zones together people get information about together and now that there is more controbuters, there is enough information tracked here. The island transfers can be tracked easily enough, as there is atleast 24hrs to notice the kades. Petition - OM's check Ice almost once every week, it would take a while in most cases for BK's to get islands. Still a very against merging and deletion of this page --Lcawte 19:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Oppose deletion It should be left alone.And it takes long to get Oms to transfer them to Bks. I tried transfering one when i had it and had the petiiton open for almost a month. And even if they do get transfered to Bks when the next person attacks the Bk will defend and we can keep track of that.--Johnw1213 May 2009 <3

No opinion on the deletion - But if the page is kept can someone please fix the spelling mistake in the title? Thanks. --Lizzie 10:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

• What is happening about this article then? It has sat a while with 1/2 Support/Deletion vote, last vote in may... --Lcawte 16:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Oppose deletion - don't delete encyclopaedic information that might be of interest to some players. --Therobotdude 19:19, 15 August 2015 (PDT)

Unknown Details

Hi Guys,

Can we fix the numbering on the kades, seen as the ones with unknown details then under it is the same kade number for a kade with details, (Example: Cringe IX) --Lcawte 15:17, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey,

Im owning booth islands so i will try to keep all updated. I have updated it now...but i cant remember some of the Flags who attacked me. But the Score is the Same. --Andruel 22:18, 27 May 2009 (GMT)

Yeah If you add somthing like

|- valign="top"
!rowspan="1"|Month Day (number)
|colspan="3" style="background:#FEF1B5"|

• Note - island defended

Or something like that --Lcawte 19:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC)