Talk:Sage blockade history/2011
From YPPedia
Heading levels
I had taken pains to adjust the heading levels so that we could get away from top-level headings, I thought that was a desirable thing to do. Why can't we adjust all the other ones to match this one instead? Chupchup 09:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Aye, I know we were avoiding top-level headings. This sort of thing, however, is the exception - third-level headings are too minor to visually separate the months from each other. Without the horizontal rule, they start to blur together a bit. --Belthazar451 13:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hm, I undid the changes, because this page is currently included in the Sage Blockade history page. So a second TOC and heading levels not matching those of that page looked strange. But most likely including this page into the main one will break down soon. Then we will probably links instead of transclude subpages, split every year and some kind of TOC to navigate between the subpages would be nice. --Alfwyn 13:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, didn't realise it was included. That might be why I got white-screened when I made the edit. --Belthazar451 13:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I get white-screened too when editing the page, but currently the result still shows correctly. Back on the heading level subject, it would probably good if all the blockade pages use the same style. I slightly prefer the style the of the Sage page, but don't care overly much. --Alfwyn 14:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hm, I undid the changes, because this page is currently included in the Sage Blockade history page. So a second TOC and heading levels not matching those of that page looked strange. But most likely including this page into the main one will break down soon. Then we will probably links instead of transclude subpages, split every year and some kind of TOC to navigate between the subpages would be nice. --Alfwyn 13:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Amity VLI
There appears to be some disagreement whether the flag Blades of Sage pulled out of the blockade after round 1. Could we resolve the situation on this talk page rather than editing back and forth? Thanks. -- Faulkston 20:54, 24 July 2011 (PDT)