Talk:PFRC

To: Whoever suggested the cleanup. What do you suggest? I'm not that experienced at wiki-editing, and frankly it's the best I could do with my current knowledge.

Dispute?

Can someone point out the dispute here?

I'm not seeing it, either. The article is still a little tough to read. The narrative doesn't flow well, but it's better than average now. --Barrister 18:12, 1 April 2006 (PST)

From a quick read through, it seems to me to be more of a descriptive problem:

• "Interesting circumstances"- less than interesting considering the circumstances aren't described.
• "stronger crew"- opinion- lots of mergers make zero change
• "high standards"- high according to whom?

And I'm reaching to find reasons it isn't neutral with those examples. It doesn't really seem to have an issue from what I see, but I didn't add the tag so I can't say for sure. --Fannon 20:44, 1 April 2006 (PST)

Updates...

Hello all.

I've taken the suggestions into account and edited the page to both include many of them, as well as update the page to reflect current events.

Anything else I need to do to get the dispute of neutrality taken care of?

-Alyred

I didnt add the tag, but your changes look great so I took the liberty of removing it (Hope I don't get yelled at for that one!) Hah. Just fyi: The wiki sorts capital letters and lowercase letters separately on the category pages, so the tag is needed to make the wiki pretend your crew name is Pfrc. Thankee Aly :) --Zava 06:03, 5 May 2006 (PDT)