Category talk:Outdated crew information

Shouldn't there be templates to go with the Category:Outdated crew information and Category:Outdated flag information? I believe that a crew or flag article's outdated status is important enough for a notice at the top of the article.--Zyborg22 09:20, 3 May 2006 (PDT)

I thought that was the point of having the date inside the infobox. An extra little box seems like a waste as I see very few people actually paying attention to it. Those who care enough about the outdated information already update their boxes. --Fannon 09:27, 3 May 2006 (PDT)

Oh, right. I can't believe I didn't think of that. Sorry.--Zyborg22 09:35, 3 May 2006 (PDT)

Bumpage

Couldn't sleep, started bumping. This is entirely updated with every outdated crew infobox for June. --Muffynz 23:02, 2 June 2006 (PDT)

Missing pages

Looking through the lists of crews, there are a bucketload that are outdated and have Category:Outdated crew information at the bottom of their page, but don't appear in this category listing... there are over 200 on Hunter alone, and for most of them it's been close to a year since they were updated! I haven't checked for flags, but it's probably similar. I understand that updating these pages isn't really a priority, but given I'll gradually be going through to update them anyway is there something I can/should change as I edit so that in future they appear here? --Katiekwala 07:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, you're right. For some curious reason, the category isn't refreshing. This requires more research... --Belthazar451 08:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

I guess this is a side-effect of changing the scheme to use #ifexpr. --Alfwyn 17:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)