User talk:Sagacious/Trophies
I like the new proposed layout Whitemonkey 09:11 25 October 2006 (GMT)
- Not sure if I like UL for Ult list. --Angelbeaver (talk) 07:49, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
- I was unsure of the best thing to put - #1 kinda didn't appeal to me. Open to suggestions! --Sagacious (talk) 12:19, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
Proposition: Take the old version and add in a heading for each column with each puzzle then #1, Ult and Incred below as they are. --Angelbeaver (talk) 12:26, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
- The captions below each trophy should match the name of the trophy exactly. --Barrister 23:15, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
Additional layout proposed - taking up Angelbeaver's idea. Feedback++ --Sagacious (talk) 15:34, 26 October 2006 (PDT)
- I like the new one a bit better, although Swordfighter should come after Sailor. The blank spot for Incredible Swordfighter just looks odd. Also, the names in the first column should match the in-game names. --Barrister 01:09, 27 October 2006 (PDT)
Love the new-new layout :D Whitemonkey 15:37, 27 October 2006 (GMT)
Didn't want the wider headers to make the columns different widths - does it look OK the way I did it for Carousing trophies? --Sagacious (talk) 07:44, 27 October 2006 (PDT)
- That looks fine IMO Whitemonkey 08:08, 27 October 2006 (PDT)
With some rewording of descriptions, this new layout would waste less white space than the current layout :) --Sagacious (talk) 17:58, 27 October 2006 (PDT)
Blood/Skellies/Crabs
I like this new layout. --Barrister 20:35, 6 November 2006 (PST)
- Layout numero uno or dos? --Sagacious (talk) 12:58, 8 November 2006 (PST)
- I'm a fan of numero uno. Thanks for ending the discussion and just running with it, as it's an obvious improvement. Number two saves space, but at the expense of organization. Cedricshock