Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crimson Tide"
From YPPedia
Sweetiepiepi (talk | contribs) (→Minor nitpick) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::I'm certain that Tyr's Own did not show up for Jorvik I. It was a very boring 7 rounds for us (Looterati). --[[User:Barrister|Barrister]] 00:53, 10 February 2006 (PST) | ::I'm certain that Tyr's Own did not show up for Jorvik I. It was a very boring 7 rounds for us (Looterati). --[[User:Barrister|Barrister]] 00:53, 10 February 2006 (PST) | ||
:::Rome's response: "Ah, it was Jorvik II and III that Tyr's and CT was involved in (I believe), we didn't stay long for either though due to being trashed." I'm not sure if the section should still be reworded or if it works to say we lost both, because, you know, we did technically. Input would be lovely. --[[User:Fannon|Fannon]] 15:50, 10 February 2006 (PST) | :::Rome's response: "Ah, it was Jorvik II and III that Tyr's and CT was involved in (I believe), we didn't stay long for either though due to being trashed." I'm not sure if the section should still be reworded or if it works to say we lost both, because, you know, we did technically. Input would be lovely. --[[User:Fannon|Fannon]] 15:50, 10 February 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Papaya I was won by pillaging? I wasn't there but I'm guessing the link on the term 'battle navigation' should be deleted. | ||
Revision as of 00:37, 18 February 2006
Previous contributors:
- Barrister
- Guppymomma
- 66.169.204.219
Minor nitpick
Something that should probably be pointed out is that Looterati's colonization of Jorvik was uncontested. Tyr's Own only attacked the island after Looterati already had it. --Thunderbird 22:54, 9 February 2006 (PST)
- I edited it. I'm honestly not sure which one CT was involved in, so I included both. I'll clear it up with Rome and edit it as needed. --Fannon 23:12, 9 February 2006 (PST)
- I'm certain that Tyr's Own did not show up for Jorvik I. It was a very boring 7 rounds for us (Looterati). --Barrister 00:53, 10 February 2006 (PST)
- Rome's response: "Ah, it was Jorvik II and III that Tyr's and CT was involved in (I believe), we didn't stay long for either though due to being trashed." I'm not sure if the section should still be reworded or if it works to say we lost both, because, you know, we did technically. Input would be lovely. --Fannon 15:50, 10 February 2006 (PST)
- I'm certain that Tyr's Own did not show up for Jorvik I. It was a very boring 7 rounds for us (Looterati). --Barrister 00:53, 10 February 2006 (PST)
Papaya I was won by pillaging? I wasn't there but I'm guessing the link on the term 'battle navigation' should be deleted.
