Talk:Sloop

I think the Sloop can have four swabbies if the only person on is a greenie. Likewise for the Cutter. --Ihope127 13:47, 19 November 2005 (PST)

i think a this ship shode be give as a starter ship wene you get to a officer or hige- cooker615

i think there should be able to have more people aloude on board!! like 9 or 10. atleast so u can fill all the stations- Ultimateplay

Notes box
Is the Notes box in the rooms and furnishing section supposed to have &lt;br&gt; tags in it? It doesn't word-wrap well if your screen is not exactly the right width... -- Hockeygeek 00:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Removing the  makes the table behave a bit strangely on my computer. That said, I reckon the note could simply be removed completely and placed on the crow's nest page instead. --Belthazar451 00:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Split into subpages?
At the current rate limited edition ships are added, this page becomes unwieldly fast. What about putting each variant on its own subpage (like "Sloop/rogue class")? We could then include currently available ships into the article, and just link to editions no longer available. --Alfwyn 15:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree that this page is unwieldy. Regular sloop plus frost, emerald, and rogue is just too much.  But I think we should make them main pages with links from here.  How does that sound?  --Barrister 16:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

maybe use some way of hiding the LE ships, like they do with the trophies. this would make the page alot smaller Captainpk
 * I agree with Barrister =) -- Adrielle ♥ =) 21:14, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Seperate main articles sounds good to me too. --Alfwyn 22:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I moved Chocolate down to retired and organized the retired sloops decending by year and month, hoping it would clear some unwieldiness up. Irawr Irawr 13:51, 5 March 2012 (PST)

Order of sloops
The two sections of 'special' sloops seem to be done in reverse order - one is chronological, the other is reverse chronological. I would propose alphabetically, or perhaps (though this would fit better on the sub-page idea) a sortable table. I just don't want to alphabetize without giving a chance for discussion, at least. Thoughts? Jlh0605 19:47, 5 April 2012 (PDT)
 * Looks like they were alphabetical, until a user named Irawr rearranged them at the start of last month. Go back to alphabetical, methinks. More logical. --Belthazar451 21:35, 5 April 2012 (PDT)