Talk:Conquering Storms

I'm not sure what to do with this one. There's not a single active member in the crew and the captain hasn't been online since December 7th. Worth tagging as cleanup, or delete? --Zava 08:02, 23 January 2006 (PST)
 * I support deleting it. --Barrister 11:26, 23 January 2006 (PST)
 * Captain last logged on: Feb 20. Still no development in the crew. --Zava
 * I agree with Barrister's original statement. A cleanup would remove the useless information on the page, and we'd be left with a blank page for a defunct crew. --Fannon 14:49, 8 March 2006 (PST)
 * Works for me. Support deletion. --Zava 14:51, 8 March 2006 (PST)
 * Same here. No information to work with. --Sagacious 16:15, 8 March 2006 (PST)
 * There's nothing salvageable, though... why should we maintain the ghost of a defunct crew "just because"? We do keep other defuncts around, but usually there's more to them than "lol this is crew im captin ok?" --Teeg 16:16, 8 March 2006 (PST)
 * Here, take a look: Conquering Storms. It hasn't changed since my initial comment on 1/23, aside from the more recent logon date of the captain. I've created lots of infoboxes and copied in lots of public statements, but there doesn't seem to be a point when the crew is, as PTG put it, already a ghost with no known history. --Zava 16:43, 8 March 2006 (PST)


 * Support deletion. It's an article that has no information that one would find interesting to read. --Guppymomma 16:45, 8 March 2006 (PST)
 * Now that I have more information, I support deletion. I appoligize for making such a hasty decision without all the facts. --pevarnj (t/c)  Look at this! 17:00, 8 March 2006 (PST)