User talk:AtteSmythe/templates/Edit frequency

Template:Frequency exists. Are we going to delete that one and go with this one? --Sagacious (talk) 12:37, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
 * Aaaaand no-link-and-no-category strikes again. I even searched. I don't care which one gets used, I just wanted one available. --AtteSmythe 12:40, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
 * I personally prefer this version to the other. --Sagacious (talk) 13:05, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
 * So do I: I've proposed the other one for deletion, although if people like that one better, then this one can go instead. --Emufarmers 22:04, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
 * Is there a reason this one uses instead of  ? The former puts the link in the long format. Just nitpicking, as usual ;). --Thunderbird 22:06, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
 * Because I got the same results for each, but felt the usage of the first was simpler and easier to understand. --AtteSmythe 08:40, 20 July 2006 (PDT)