Talk:Cleaver interview

It looks kinda ugly, anyone want to format it a bit better? While I get on with the other parts.--Vurogj 14:20, 24 October 2005 (PDT)


 * I've had problems uploading the files. Perhaps it doesn't like my connection, but I can't seem to upload the mp3 files. Anyone else care to try? --Nickster (t/c) 14:36, 25 November 2005 (PST)


 * Yep, I've had issues as well with the files, which is why I've delayed uploading them. – Yaten talk 17:10, 25 November 2005 (PST)

Can you actually upload non-image files? The (info) box next to it has an Image: prefix. --Piplicus 10:23, 26 November 2005 (PST)


 * Yep, we have support for .jpg, .png, .gif, .mp3, and .pdf (I think). Check out Image:Cobalt-viridian ocean map.pdf for an example  10:44, 26 November 2005 (PST)

Stub?
Just a question, why does this fall under the stub category, it seems pretty long to me. --Sulu 13:07, 5 December 2005 (PST)


 * Probably because there are several sections yet to be transcribed. To be accurate, the page should really have several  tags for the incomplete sections.  --Barrister 13:55, 5 December 2005 (PST)


 * If someone has the originals and can either put them on webspace somewhere or upload them here, I would take a stab at finishing the transcription. Eventually. ;) --AtteSmythe 14:54, 6 January 2006 (PST)


 * I'm trying to upload it again now... not sure that they've fixed the uploading since the last time though... --Nickster (t/c) 15:03, 6 January 2006 (PST)

Cleanup
Reformatted Part 1. Like/dislike? --AtteSmythe 12:58, 6 January 2006 (PST)


 * Like. I don't know why so many random pirates have their names linked, but that should get removed as you re-format.  I'll try and do some transcribing this weekend.--Fiddler 13:27, 6 January 2006 (PST)
 * I'm not so fond of the links in general...however, they do work well in the relese notes, which are a similar case. Not sure what I'll do with 'em yet, so I'll focus on the formatting for now...--AtteSmythe 15:04, 6 January 2006 (PST)

Continued Transcription
Is it worth it? I've started to give it a shot, but if people don't think it's at all valuable, then I'd probably not do it. If it is worth it, though, it's a nice long-term project to work on. If you guys think it's a good idea, then I'd also appreciate people to come after me and check it over- it's a lot easier once something's already written down for you. Also the whole formatting thing. --Darkaardvark 19:38, 15 March 2007 (PDT)
 * I think it's a nifty idea. It's historical!  --Guppymomma 19:53, 15 March 2007 (PDT)
 * Alright, cool. I didn't want to get all the way through and then go "...well, that was pointless." But I suppose it's somewhat more authoritative to have in text form and might be a good resource for the List and Anti-List. And the historical record. Anyways, by the time it's finished it looks like it'll be far and away the largest page on the wiki, so it might be a good idea to split it into sub-pages at some point. I'll think some more on that. --Darkaardvark 18:12, 16 March 2007 (PDT)
 * Hero points for Darkaardvark. If I ever get around to rescuing the harddrive with my transcripts on I'd be happy to poke and prod. I think I did all seven parts, but was formatting when I vanished, and only had the first two uploaded.--Vurogj 07:19, 23 August 2007 (PDT)