User talk:Sagacious/Archive 0706

Funky blockade note coloring
I liked it, but I didn't love it so much that I have to have it. (Unlike the sinking/non-sinking colors.) If you think it looks good, go ahead. :-) --Barrister 10:39, 12 July 2006 (PDT)

jollyrodger says
its because its so hard to comr up with something good and it wont let me put on pictures

quick question
hiya, i saw on your userpage that you like to add pictures to pages.. i tried but couldn't make it work.. could you add greenwolf's avatar from the forums to his info page? his forum account is tommy. Cheers! --Lizzie 06:41, 17 July 2006 (PDT)

Housing images
Actually I have a better idea. Just continue doing all of 'em. When you're done with each one, just leave me a message and I can diff back in history to the one before your work & zap 'em all in one giant swoop. --Guppymomma 19:11, 17 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I probably should have noticed & asked this earlier, but where are you getting some of the "new" room names? I recall previously that Yaten had done at least some of them using Tools to see what the "official" name was from the game.  I think I have enough money on Cobalt to get a left-facing whatever to redo the screenshots.  Might not get around to it until this weekend though.  It's on the wishlist.  If you notice any other low quality ones, please add 'em there. --Guppymomma 06:33, 18 July 2006 (PDT)


 * Okey, the old ones for villa & mansion are done. I accidentally zapped one of the mansion ones that weren't renamed, but luckily it was an image that I'd collected in the first place so I was able to reupload.  Just holler when you get estate and want the old ones cleaned up. (the previous ones are all old image cleaned up, right?) --Guppymomma 15:55, 18 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I mean that a few of the mansion image names didn't change and I accidentally removed one but was able to replace it. Higher rest row house images are done, I'll remove it from the wishlist if you can kill the lowres tags. --Guppymomma 16:25, 18 July 2006 (PDT)

CSDs
I appreciate you marking pages as candidates for speedy deletions. However, please don't overwrite what was there. Otherwise, I can't assess whether you're making the right call, or if the page should be marked "proposed deletion" instead. So, each time I see a page with only, I have to go to the history page and see what you removed. --Barrister 12:39, 18 July 2006 (PDT)
 * Please use only when immediate action is necessary.  Black Souls didn't need an immediate deletion. As reminder, here are the instructions from Template:Delete:

"Use this template when you believe an article should be removed from Y!PPedia immediately, without the need for any further debate or discussion. This template should only be used when the page is in clear violation of rules or policy. If a page is in any sort of gray area, use proposed deletion instead. (If the content is vandalism, don't forget to warn the user!)"--Barrister 14:43, 22 July 2006 (PDT)

Talk pages
Why exactly did you do this? I don't believe you're supposed to just squeeze in comments like that. Anyway, I fixed it. It makes more sense this way. --Paladin

Behavior
-Section Removed: Lacked factual content- --Guppymomma 17:09, 27 July 2006 (PDT)


 * Fifteen minutes before editing? This is a wiki, as in, "publically editable". I have two major arguments I'd like to make clear regarding this subject alone;


 * 1) Sagacious is not customer service, why should he be treated as such?
 * 2) Sagacious is doing what's best for the wiki, he is not "treating other editors" in any bad way, he is merely editing a wiki, which now appears to be criminal.
 * I'm going to say what I have to say, YPPedia is headed downhill with actions taken against editors for doing what editors do, edit. IMO, this is especially bad when it's the first thing I see when I return. &mdash;Sivius(T/C) 19:47, 27 July 2006 (PDT)

Edits
It's your user talk: page, so you can do whatever you like. However, an administrator telling you to stop violating policy, with the full backing of the other administrators and at least one OM, is never "lacking factual content and POV". Please do not invent YPPedia policy when convenient for your purposes. Thanks! --Ponytailguy 07:57, 11 August 2006 (PDT)

...
Believe what you like. If you wish to believe that there's a vast administrator conspiracy to keep you away, that's your perogative. It doesn't make it any more true, but it remains your perogative. If you disagree with administrator actions, contact Eurydice. If you disagree with Eurydice, use the Support Form. But don't you dare point fingers until you get your facts straight. --Ponytailguy 17:13, 11 August 2006 (PDT)