Talk:Ols

Retagging Cleanup
I'm going to be a little nitpicky because I've seen this a lot, recently. If an article is tagged Cleanup, and an editor takes a stab at cleaning, but it isn't enough, it'd be really nice to replace the tag with a Cleanupfor the second time. IMO, it's more likely to produce useful edits than retagging with the same template. --AtteSmythe 11:12, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
 * To be fair, I did originally use cleanupfor; the page creator removed it, and Lizzie re-tagged it with regular cleanup (either she didn't check the history, or she didn't know about that tag: I'm sure she'll read this, and then she will :)). Cleanupfor can be helpful, but it's not that critical: It's usually pretty obvious why an article needs cleanup, although if the problems are subtle, cleanupfor can certainly make things clearer. --Emufarmers 22:48, 19 July 2006 (PDT)

Fiddling
Although I much appreciate this, dont majorly edit this page (Now wording, and reshuffling text). Its fine how it is, and if you really think of a flaw. Disscuss here! --Soveruin
 * Anyone is free to edit a main-namespace page as long as it is constructive. If you want a page which is yours alone, you are free to edit User:Soveruin as you see fit, without changes by anyone else. --Emufarmers 06:03, 21 July 2006 (PDT)

Re-Direct
Could someone put a re-direction from Soveruin, Ollicus and Llwellyn? --Soveruin
 * There is no pirate named Soveruin. For the other two, you may create redirects if you think those alts are significant enough to merit it. (I'm dubious, because since each appears to be a greenie alt or equivilent, it's doubtful that anybody would ever search for one. Further, having the redirect would potentially be misleading, in case someone else decided to use one of those names on another ocean.) --Emufarmers 11:32, 22 July 2006 (PDT)