Talk:Barrenmore

Aside from the cleanup and disputed information, shouldn't this be marked as vanity? It doesn't conform to any of the standards for pirate pages, in my opinion. --Fannon 20:34, 4 February 2006 (PST)


 * If the disputed fact of said pirate is true, then the page should be cleaned up, and expanded on, to allow the page to conform to the standard of "notable pirate", in my opinion. Airwoman ros 14:33, 22 February 2006 (PST)
 * I have serious doubts about the truth of the claims. And Kittenhugger hasn't come back to clarify. I'll give it a few more days, but then I'm proposing deletion.  I'd rather have no page, than a page with a false claim to notability.  --Barrister 16:03, 22 February 2006 (PST)
 * Do I just have a longer memory than the rest of you old timers? http://forums.puzzlepirates.com/community/mvnforum/viewthread?thread=2355&offset=60 http://forums.puzzlepirates.com/community/mvnforum/viewthread?p=20807#20807 --Guppymomma 16:40, 22 February 2006 (PST)
 * He was the first to defeat the black ship, but certainly not the only one who has done so (especially with the booched second version). --Thunderbird 16:48, 22 February 2006 (PST)


 * Its Not A Vanity Page,He destroyed the black ship.He deserves a page. --Lpmike 10:09, 17 May 2006 (PDT)
 * You're three months late to this conversation, please check the timestamps. --Barrister 11:54, 17 May 2006 (PDT)